<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is Energy Always Conserved? The Exceptions to the Rule of Energy Conservation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://agclimate.org/is-energy-always-conserved-the-exceptions-to-the-rule-of-energy-conservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://agclimate.org/is-energy-always-conserved-the-exceptions-to-the-rule-of-energy-conservation/</link>
	<description>AgClimate provides important new tools to help producers understand and plan for climatic conditions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles Rogers		</title>
		<link>https://agclimate.org/is-energy-always-conserved-the-exceptions-to-the-rule-of-energy-conservation/#comment-312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agclimate.org/is-energy-always-conserved-the-exceptions-to-the-rule-of-energy-conservation/#comment-312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You failed to mention a single exception to the law of conservation of energy. All of your &quot;exceptions&quot; are just show that the accounting for it can get complicated in some circumstances. They have all been investigated in detail and none of them pan out, and the scientists doing the investigations are not slacking off either - any such discovery would result in an instant Noble Prize. This is very irresponsible reporting. This sounds like more of the ongoing strategy of scientific denialism being fostered by climate deniers. See https://www.ipie.info/research/sfp2025-2 for more information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You failed to mention a single exception to the law of conservation of energy. All of your &#8220;exceptions&#8221; are just show that the accounting for it can get complicated in some circumstances. They have all been investigated in detail and none of them pan out, and the scientists doing the investigations are not slacking off either &#8211; any such discovery would result in an instant Noble Prize. This is very irresponsible reporting. This sounds like more of the ongoing strategy of scientific denialism being fostered by climate deniers. See <a href="https://www.ipie.info/research/sfp2025-2" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ipie.info/research/sfp2025-2</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
